Find what the schedule missed before the other side does.

Upload the plan documents, schedule and estimate. IPSES reconciles them and shows every scope gap, sequencing conflict and lead-time trap before you submit.

Start your free review Upload & run a review

First project free. Private by default.

Northstar Medical Center, Phase IISample data

Review complete5 findings

F-001AHUs released 14 weeks after order-by date$1.24M+14 d
F-002Level 4 medical gas absent from schedule$862K+9 d
F-009CDPHE approval not modeled as a predecessor$415K+30 d
F-004Elevators have no predecessor to shaft completion$445K+22 d
F-003Podium and tower fit-out can run concurrently$610K−16 d

At risk$2.96M 75 d

Recoverable$610K 16 d

Schedules get rejected for things a human reviewer can't see in a week.

P-402
Scope you never priced
Sheet P-402, rev 4
A med gas manifold on sheet P-402 that never made it into the estimate is not a scheduling error. It's a six-figure gap between the documents and the price, discovered too late to fix cheaply.
+14 wk
Lead times that don't reconcile
Spec 23 73 13, MEP-2210
A 38-week AHU released 14 weeks late doesn't fail today. It fails eighteen months from now, on the critical path, when nobody can recover it.
17 d
Money left on the table
ENV-2900 to INT-3000
Idle gaps, duplicate mobilizations and stick-built scope that could be prefabricated. Risk gets attention. Recoverable margin usually doesn't.

Start with the documents you already have.

Plans, specifications, addenda, contract exhibits, quantity data and the proposed CPM schedule and estimate.

What you upload

Drawing set, 100% CD842 pages
Project manualDivisions 00 to 48
Addenda 01 to 0674 pages
Owner contract & exhibits214 pages
Quantity dataBIM r12

What it is checked against

Baseline scheduleRev. C, 1,240 activities
EstimateCost breakdown

It plugs into the stack your submission is already built in.

Oracle Primavera P6Schedule
Microsoft ProjectSchedule
ProcoreProject data
AutodeskDesign & docs
BluebeamDocument review
ClaudeFrontier model
GPTFrontier model
Custom API integrationsYour systems of record
MCP integrationsAgent-native access

A side-by-side review that runs in hours, not weeks.

Frontier models read what the contract documents say should be built and compare it, line by line, to what your schedule and estimate say will be built.

Every link is checked. The ones that don't hold become findings. See the methodology

Every gap is margin you could lose or revenue you could leave behind.

Omissions, sequencing conflicts, missing logic, unrealistic durations, resource conflicts, lead-time risk, document inconsistencies, float and scope gaps.

Negative risk

What it could cost you

Missed scope that erodes margin or budget after award
Sequencing that cannot physically be built as drawn
Long-lead equipment that lands on the critical path
Inspection, permit and commissioning gaps that stall turnover
Float and logic defects that get the schedule rejected outright

Positive opportunity

What it could earn you

Idle time between phases that compresses with no added risk
Procurement resequencing that saves days and locks price holds
Duplicate mobilizations that collapse into one
Prefabrication alternates the specification already permits
Change-driven scope the plan never reconciled into dates or dollars

Averages across reviewed contracts, per $100M

$2.6M
Margin at risk surfaced, per $100M of contract value
$1.1M
Recoverable revenue & efficiency identified
20+
Clarifications resolved before submission
12
Schedule days of exposure found on the critical path

Indicative averages. Every contract and project varies in risk and revenue.

We don't replace schedulers. We give them their week back.

Your scheduler shouldn't spend four days cross-checking sheet numbers against activity IDs. IPSES does the mechanical reconciliation across every document in the set, then hands your team a ranked, evidenced list to exercise judgment on. Time moves from document-chasing to the decisions that actually protect the bid.

Side-by-side review
Documents on one side, schedule on the other, with every link traced.
Highest-level security
Encryption in transit and at rest, tenant isolation, SSO and full audit logging.

Toggle the checks you want, choose the findings you include, and review the key findings alongside the complete audit analysis.

Representative findingCritical

Air handling units released 14 weeks after required order-by date

Source: Spec 23 73 13, p. 7, §2.1.B
Affected activity: MEP-2210, AHU Submittal & Fabrication Release
Financial impact: $1,240,000
Schedule impact: 14 days, critical path
Confidence: 94%

Recommended action: pull MEP-2210 forward to Nov-2026, add an early-release procurement activity, and confirm the 38-week lead time in writing before submission.

First project free, so you can see what you've been missing.

Send us one live pursuit. We'll run the full review against your own documents and walk you through every finding, the evidence behind it, and the dollars attached. If it doesn't find anything worth acting on, you've lost nothing.

Claim your free review See pricing